rustlings.git/exercises/move_semantics/move_semantics5.rs, branch main

Update Exercises Directory Names to Reflect Order

2023-10-16T11:37:12Z

Make move_semantics5 a test

2023-08-26T22:48:19Z

docs: cleanup the explanation paragraphs at the start of each exercise.

2023-05-29T17:41:51Z

feat(move_semantics): finish updating comments

2022-07-12T13:43:26Z

fix(move_semantics5): correct typo (#857)

2021-09-30T08:18:36Z

fix(move_semantics5): change &mut *y to &mut x (#814)

2021-09-25T08:52:18Z

Instead of having to explain why ```rs let mut x = 100; let y = &mut x; let mut z_owned = *y; let z = &mut z_owned; *y += 100; *z += 1000; ``` and ```rs let mut x = 100; let y = &mut x; let z = &mut *y; *y += 100; *z += 1000; ``` are different, you still get the point across about having only one mutable reference. As it stands, this exercise does too much (dereferencing and having only one mutable reference), and by doing so confuses people. Example of someone being confused by this:

fix(move_semantics5): Clarify instructions

2021-07-29T10:37:15Z

fix: move_semantics5 hints

2021-05-23T03:09:58Z

Improve the hints for move_semantics5, as well as the explanatory comments in the code. Previously, it was not clear what possible changes were allowed. It seems that reordering the statements might be the intended solution. The previous comment about not "adding newlines" doesn't make sense, so treating it as "adding new lines" makes it more clear.

feat: Add move_semantics5 exercise. (#746)

2021-05-17T12:10:40Z

* feat: Add move_semantics5 exercise. * feat: Add option3 exercise * Address review comments. Fix typos, sentence formatting. * Remove unwanted newline. * Address review comments: make comment inline, fix format in print.