rustlings.git/exercises/test1.rs, branch mainRustlings course
http://homelab.tail42a6a2.ts.net/rustlings.git/atom?h=main2020-05-19T16:47:44Zfeat: renames test to quiz, fixes #2442020-05-19T16:47:44ZSanjay Ksanjaykdragon@users.noreply.github.com2020-05-19T16:47:44Zurn:sha1:010a04569282149cea7f7a76fc4d7f4c9f0f08dd
BREAKING CHANGE
* changed test to quiz: fixes issues in #244
* fixed info.toml: #244
* fixed naming related issuesCreated consistent money unit2019-12-30T00:15:32Zgnodarsegabenodarse@yahoo.com2019-12-30T00:15:32Zurn:sha1:fd57f8f2c1da2af8ddbebbccec214e6f40f4dbabfeat: improve `watch` execution mode2019-11-11T15:23:35ZRoberto Vidalvidal.roberto.j@gmail.com2019-11-11T12:38:24Zurn:sha1:2cdd61294f0d9a53775ee24ad76435bec8a21e60
The `watch` command now requires user action to move to the next
exercise.
BREAKING CHANGE: this changes the behavior of `watch`.
fix: Rewrite test1 logic2019-10-29T19:53:41Zmarisamokou@posteo.de2019-10-29T19:53:41Zurn:sha1:79a569422c8309cfc9e4aed25bf4ab3b3859996bchore: Clarify comment in exercises/test1.rs2019-10-29T03:08:46ZScott Sweenyscott@ssweeny.net2019-10-29T03:08:46Zurn:sha1:2821227acf52970fa04b79f1d8c0992bc0dec06e
closes #194
The author of issue #194 suggests that the wording of the comment is at
least ambiguous about the desired results. I believe this change more
clearly describes the expectation of the exercise.
fix(test1): Swap assertion parameter order2019-07-13T12:31:57ZPete McFarlanepeterjohnmcfarlane@gmail.com2019-07-13T12:31:57Zurn:sha1:4086d463a981e81d97781851d17db2ced290f446
`Expected` should come before `actual`, other wise it leads to confusing compiler messages, e.g.
```
note: expected type `()`
found type `{integer}`
```fix(test1): renamed function name to snake case2019-06-28T15:00:10ZJessejessec.cameron@gmail.com2019-06-28T15:00:10Zurn:sha1:89d5186c0dae8135ecabf90ee8bb35949bc2d29b
closes #180
fix test command execution2019-02-15T11:06:05Zlivliv@fastmail.com2019-02-15T11:06:05Zurn:sha1:02ceb0ba8c0f82cefaaa531aec06c12dc0400525
seems like i forgot that you actually need to run executables created
with `rustc --test`! this also reworks the "test1" exercise a bit
closes #108
add tests; refactor exercise links2019-01-23T19:48:01Zlivliv@fastmail.com2019-01-23T19:48:01Zurn:sha1:dc1f3b79f8b528659e39057ac733d07e1051bc4dadd a test2019-01-09T20:47:50Zlivliv@fastmail.com2019-01-09T20:47:50Zurn:sha1:17e12433cbe0174fe93196a43953af95ccb71dae