diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'rustlings-macros')
| -rw-r--r-- | rustlings-macros/info.toml | 19 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 13 deletions
diff --git a/rustlings-macros/info.toml b/rustlings-macros/info.toml index 4fd2bd8..5c24cd3 100644 --- a/rustlings-macros/info.toml +++ b/rustlings-macros/info.toml @@ -856,7 +856,10 @@ argument, `assert!` will do nothing (in which case the test will pass) or `assert!` will panic (in which case the test will fail). So try giving different values to `assert!` and see which ones compile, which -ones pass, and which ones fail :)""" +ones pass, and which ones fail :) + +If you want to check for `false`, you can negate the result of what you're +checking using `!`, like `assert!(!…)`.""" [[exercises]] name = "tests2" @@ -870,19 +873,9 @@ Try switching which argument comes first and which comes second!""" name = "tests3" dir = "17_tests" hint = """ -You can call a function right where you're passing arguments to `assert!`. So -you could do something like `assert!(having_fun())`. - -If you want to check that you indeed get `false`, you can negate the result of -what you're doing using `!`, like `assert!(!having_fun())`.""" - -[[exercises]] -name = "tests4" -dir = "17_tests" -hint = """ -We expect method `Rectangle::new()` to panic for negative values. +We expect the method `Rectangle::new` to panic for negative values. -To handle that you need to add a special attribute to the test function. +To handle that, you need to add a special attribute to the test function. You can refer to the docs: https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/book/ch11-01-writing-tests.html#checking-for-panics-with-should_panic""" |