| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-16 | Update Exercises Directory Names to Reflect Order | Adam Brewer | |
| 2023-05-29 | docs: cleanup the explanation paragraphs at the start of each exercise. | Robert Fry | |
| 2023-05-17 | Merge pull request #1487 from lionel-rowe/patch-1 | liv | |
| feat(options2): better test for layered_option | |||
| 2023-05-09 | fix(options3): panic when not matching to avoid false positives | Noah May | |
| Closes #1503 | |||
| 2023-04-21 | feat(options2): better tests for layered_option | lionel-rowe | |
| The existing test can be solved with the following: ```rs while let Some(integer) = optional_integers.pop() { assert_eq!(integer.unwrap(), range); ``` Similarly with `expect(...)`, `unwrap_or(0)`, `unwrap_or_default()`, etc. However, none of these solutions use the learning point of stacking `Option<T>`s. The updated test can _only_ be solved by stacking `Option<T>`s: ```rs while let Some(Some(integer)) = optional_integers.pop() { assert_eq!(integer, cursor); ``` With the updated test, using `unwrap` or `expect` will panic when it hits the `None` value, and using `unwrap_or` or `unwrap_or_default` will cause the final `assert_eq!(cursor, 0)` to panic. | |||
| 2023-03-30 | feat(docs): add markdown linter for exercises README.md files | Ali Afsharzadeh | |
| 2023-02-12 | Merge pull request #1228 from grzegorz-zur/patch-1 | liv | |
| Removed unnecessary use statement | |||
| 2022-11-24 | chore: added more descriptive TODOs | TK Buristrakul | |
| 2022-10-11 | docs(options1): fix and clarify 24 hour time instruction | bhbuehler | |
| 2022-10-11 | Removed unnecessary use statement | Grzegorz Żur | |
| 2022-08-17 | chore: make options2 not compile deliberately | magnusrodseth | |
| 2022-08-17 | test: Convert main function to working tests | magnusrodseth | |
| 2022-08-17 | Update options1.rs | vostok92 | |
| Fix assertions | |||
| 2022-08-15 | Update options1.rs | Nico Vromans | |
| Added extra test for before 10PM and updated the test for at 10PM (when it's 10PM there should already not be any ice cream left, as per the description). Also fixed the `raw_value` test, as it is later than 10PM, so there should be no more ice cream left. | |||
| 2022-08-11 | fix(options1): remove unused code | Markus Boehme | |
| Since rewriting the exercise in commit 06e4fd376586 the print_number function goes unused. Remove it. | |||
| 2022-07-26 | feat(options1): update expected result | Tristan Nicholls | |
| Expected result is updated to better showcase the difference between - a valid result with no ice-creams `Some(0)`, and - an invalid result `None`. | |||
| 2022-07-14 | feat(options): add hint comments | mokou | |
| 2022-07-14 | feat(options1): rewrite to remove array stuff | mokou | |
| 2022-07-14 | fix: rename option to options | mokou | |
 |
index : rustlings.git | |
| Rustlings course |
| summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff |